Jesus Christ

From Auroville Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

“Christ realised himself as the Son who is one with the Father — he must therefore be an aṁśa avatāra, a partial incarnation.”[1]

“Sri Aurobindo considered Christ an Avatar (a minor form of Avatar). One emanation of the Divine's aspect of Love, he always said. But what people have made of him! ... ”[2]

“When we thus understand the conception of Avatarhood, we see that … the external aspect has only a secondary importance. Such controversies as the one that has raged in Europe over the historicity of Christ, would seem to a spiritually-minded Indian largely a waste of time; he would concede to it a considerable historical, but hardly any religious importance; for what does it matter in the end whether a Jesus son of the carpenter Joseph was actually born in Nazareth or Bethlehem, lived and taught and was done to death on a real or trumped-up charge of sedition, so long as we can know by spiritual experience the inner Christ, live uplifted in the light of his teaching and escape from the yoke of the natural Law by that atonement of man with God of which the crucifixion is the symbol? If the Christ, God made man, lives within our spiritual being, it would seem to matter little whether or not a son of Mary physically lived and suffered and died in Judea. So too the Krishna who matters to us is the eternal incarnation of the Divine and not the historical teacher and leader of men.”[3]

  1. Letters on Yoga – I, p.501
  2. Agenda, 15 December 1962
  3. Essays on the Gita, p.15, “The Divine Teacher”

See also